Coronavirus: Employer’s resource centre — live guidance available here

The right to choose “Unreasonable” companions

BY Gerry O'Hare
Employment Law & HR
BG Purple

Workers have a legal entitlement to be accompanied to disciplinary or grievance meetings by a work colleague or trade union representative.

What, however, if the employer does not view the choice of companion as ‘reasonable’; perhaps due to the disruptiveness of the companion at previous meetings or a belief that the attendance of the companion will prejudice the hearing?  Can the employer veto the choice of companion? 

The answer is no according to the EAT in the case of Toal v GB Oils Ltd. In this case, the employer refused to allow the Claimant’s first choice of companion attend the grievance meeting.  A substitute trade union official attended instead.  The EAT found that the employee was entitled to insist that his first choice of companion attend the meeting, and by refusing this request, the employer was in breach of the statutory right of accompaniment.  The fact that the employer allowed a second representative to attend did not cure the breach. 

The case was remitted to the tribunal to assess compensation. 

While not frequent, LAW have come across cases where the first choice companion is felt to be unsuitable for various reasons.  This case suggests that provided the companion falls within the statutory definition of a work colleague or trade union representative, the employer will have no power to refuse to allow the companion’s attendance at the meeting, and will instead have to rely on a firm management of the meeting to avoid disruptive behaviour!

© Copyright of Law At Work 2021 Law At Work is part of Marlowe plc’s employee relations division